Why this matters now
Everyone is being asked to do more with less. Whether you run a growth-stage SaaS company, manage a factory floor, or head up finance at a mid-market firm, the pressure to cut costs without killing future growth is real. AI isn’t a magic wand — but when it’s applied the right way, it turns routine cost reduction into repeatable, measurable wins instead of one-off belt-tightening.
What this introduction will give you
- A clear view of what a cost savings consultant actually delivers in the first 90 days — not buzzwords, but concrete outputs you can expect.
- A plain-language breakdown of the AI tools and approaches that pay for themselves: from inventory planning and predictive maintenance to automation and vendor rationalization.
- Practical signals you can use to decide whether a consultant will succeed at your company and a short checklist of data you’ll need to unlock fast savings.
The promise — and the reality
Good cost savings work is fast, evidence-based, and aligned to the business: you should see initial wins in weeks, reliable run-rates in months, and confirmed cash savings within a quarter. This playbook is built around that timeline — what to measure, how to measure it, and how to avoid the usual pitfalls (shiny pilots that never scale, or “savings” that are just shifted costs).
How to read this playbook
Think of the next sections as a toolbox plus a map. The toolbox explains the AI-first stack and where it typically delivers the biggest returns (SaaS, energy, logistics, payments, telecom). The map is the 90-day plan, the selection checklist for consultants, and the sector playbooks that show where seven-figure wins usually hide. No jargon. No vague promises. Just practical steps you can take or ask your consultant to take.
If you want fast impact, focus on: the data you already have (usage logs, contracts, ledgers, machine telemetry), low-friction automation that cuts manual work, and a savings-verification process that ties fees to real outcomes. Read on and you’ll get a repeatable, AI-first approach you can start testing this week.
What a cost savings consultant actually delivers in 90 days
Savings you can bank: typical ranges by category (SaaS, energy, logistics, payments, telecom)
In the first 90 days a consultant focuses on high‑probability, high‑velocity opportunities: removing waste, renegotiating terms, and automating obvious manual work. For software and subscriptions the work centres on license rationalization, plan right‑sizing and usage-based billing cleanups. For energy it’s quick operational levers such as scheduling, basic controls and tariff optimisation. In logistics the emphasis is on consolidation, route and carrier choices, and eliminating low‑value expedited freight. For payments and merchant services the consultant looks for routing, fee allocation, and reconciliation inefficiencies. Telecom reviews typically target duplicate circuits, unused voice/data bundles and contract rebates.
The deliverable is not a vague promise but a portfolio of validated actions: a short list of prioritized fixes you can implement immediately, an estimate of recurring run‑rate savings, and a plan for larger medium‑term projects that follow once momentum is proven.
Engagement model: data we need, timeline, and how fees align to savings
Typical 90‑day engagements follow a tight sequence: rapid kickoff and access, focused discovery, quick‑win pilots, then scale and handover. Early weeks are discovery: the consultant asks for core financial and operational records (billing and invoice histories, subscription inventories and usage logs, contract files, supplier invoices, and basic systems access), plus a small group of stakeholder interviews to map decision and approval paths.
With that input the team runs rapid diagnostics, proposes 3–7 immediate interventions suitable for pilot, and deploys proof points. Pilots are deliberately small and measurable so savings can be validated quickly; once verified, actions are rolled out across the business in the remaining weeks. Documentation and a simple governance model are handed over so the client can sustain savings after day 91.
Fee structures are flexible: some consultants combine a modest retainer or fixed sprint fee with a success component tied to verified, recurring savings; others offer pure fixed‑price diagnostics or fully contingent models. Good engagements make verification simple: establish a baseline, agree on measurement rules, and pay out only for savings attributable under the agreed definitions.
Metrics that matter: OPEX, working capital, cash conversion, payback
A 90‑day program is judged on a small set of finance and operational KPIs. The primary measures are reductions in recurring operating expense, improvements to cash flow and working capital (for example by shortening payment cycles or reclaiming overpayments), and the time it takes for a proposed change to pay back its implementation cost. Operational metrics tied to execution—contract coverage, number of automated workflows, and verified vendor credits—are used to prove that projected savings are real.
Consultants deliver both numbers and governance: a reconciled “before” baseline, a transparent list of interventions with owner assignments, and a short verification window post‑implementation. That combination turns proposals into accountable line items on the P&L and balance sheet, and it creates the dashboards leadership needs to keep savings permanent.
Once those 90‑day levers are in place and tracked, the natural next step is to look at the technology and automation stack that can scale and sustain these wins across the organisation. This is where tooling, models and integrated automation multiply the initial outcomes and turn one‑off gains into lasting capability.
The AI cost‑reduction stack that pays for itself
Inventory and supply‑chain optimization: fewer disruptions, 20–25% lower carrying and logistics costs
Start with demand and inventory: combine sales, ERP shipments, and supplier lead‑time data into a single forecasting layer, then apply multi‑echelon inventory optimization and dynamic reorder policies. Short pilots typically target slow‑moving SKUs, safety‑stock tuning and consolidation of carriers — the kind of fixes that unlock immediate working‑capital and logistics savings without heavy capex.
“AI-enhanced inventory and supply‑chain planning has been shown to reduce supply‑chain disruptions by ~40%, lower overall supply‑chain costs by ~25% and cut inventory carrying costs by around 20%.” Manufacturing Industry Challenges & AI-Powered Solutions — D-LAB research
Practical deliverables: a prioritized list of SKUs to reclassify, updated reorder policies, a carrier‑consolidation plan and a measured pilot that proves run‑rate savings before wider rollout — so the tooling often pays for itself inside the first year.
Predictive maintenance and process optimization: -40% defects, -20% energy, +30% efficiency
Second, instrument your critical assets and processes. Combine simple IoT telemetry with ML models that predict failure modes, then close the loop with prescriptive work orders and process control changes. Parallel process‑analytics work surfaces bottlenecks and quality drivers so engineering fixes are targeted and measurable.
“Factory process optimization and predictive maintenance can cut manufacturing defects by roughly 40%, boost operational efficiency by ~30% and reduce energy use by about 20%.” Manufacturing Industry Challenges & AI-Powered Solutions — D-LAB research
Deliverables include a ranked list of assets by ROI, a monitored pilot that replaces calendar‑based maintenance with condition‑based alerts, and a dashboard showing defect and energy trends so savings are verifiable and auditable.
Workflow automation and co‑pilots: 112–457% ROI, less busywork across finance, IT, and ops
Across back‑office and product teams, the biggest fast wins come from automating repeatable tasks and embedding co‑pilots into knowledge workflows. Think invoice triage, contract extraction, reconciliations, and engineering review assistants that speed execution and reduce error rates — all with human oversight.
“AI agents, co‑pilots and assistants have delivered reported ROIs of 112–457% over 3 years, reduce manual tasks by 40–50% and can scale data processing by ~300x.” Portfolio Company Exit Preparation Technologies to Enhance Valuation — D-LAB research
Typical outputs are automated playbooks (e.g., AP exception handling), a staged rollout plan for co‑pilots, and a governance model that ensures accuracy, compliance and incremental adoption so cost savings compound rather than degrade.
Vendor and SaaS right‑sizing with spend intelligence: eliminate shelfware, renegotiate contracts
Finally, treat external spend as a balance‑sheet lever. Inventory every contract and subscription, pair usage telemetry with role‑based access, and run targeted renegotiations for top suppliers. Consolidating licenses, removing dormant seats, and shifting to usage‑based pricing where appropriate are low‑risk, high‑velocity plays.
Deliverables are straightforward: a cleaned‑up SaaS inventory, a short list of renegotiation targets with expected recurring savings, and a chargeback model so business units own ongoing consumption. When combined with automation and supply‑chain fixes, vendor rationalization helps convert one‑time savings into sustainable margin improvement.
When these layers are implemented together — inventory and logistics, asset health and process control, workflow automation, plus disciplined vendor management — the stack not only delivers measurable near‑term savings but creates the telemetry and control needed to sustain them. With that foundation in place, the next step is to lock those gains behind resilience and operational controls so savings survive audits, market shocks and growth.
Cut costs and build resilience: cybersecurity and sustainability that save money
Security frameworks (ISO 27002, SOC 2, NIST) that avoid seven‑figure breach costs and protect IP
Security is a cost‑avoidance lever as much as a risk program. The right frameworks turn cyber hygiene into a repeatable, auditable process: asset inventory, least‑privilege access, patch cadence, logging and incident playbooks. Those controls both reduce breach likelihood and shorten recovery time — protecting revenue, IP and buyer confidence during diligence.
“The average cost of a data breach in 2023 was $4.24M; adopting frameworks such as ISO 27002, SOC 2 and NIST materially reduces breach risk, protects IP and helps defend valuation against value‑eroding incidents.” Portfolio Company Exit Preparation Technologies to Enhance Valuation — D-LAB research
Deliverables in a 90‑day push: a prioritized remediation backlog, a minimum viable detection and response stack, scoped SOC or audit readiness workstreams (SOC 2/ISO evidence packs or NIST gap closure), and an owner‑driven roadmap so technical debt doesn’t reintroduce risk. Frame fees and success metrics around verified reductions in uncovered findings and time‑to‑detect/contain improvements.
Lower energy and materials use without new capex: quick wins in metering, scheduling, and quality
Start small and measurable: add submeters and short‑run analytics on high‑use circuits, overlay simple scheduling rules (shift loads to off‑peak pricing windows, batch similar runs), and deploy automated quality checks that cut scrap. These moves often require no major capital — they use telemetry plus rules or lightweight ML to reveal inefficiencies and timing fixes.
Typical outputs are a metering map, a prioritized list of scheduling and setpoint changes, simple anomaly detection for yield losses, and an implementation plan that maps expected savings to owners. Because work is staged and reversible, finance can treat these as operational optimizations rather than risky capital projects.
Compliance readiness that reduces audit and supplier risk (DPPs, traceability, greener logistics)
Regulation and procurement increasingly award contracts based on traceability and sustainability. Implementing digital product passports, standard supplier attestations, and a tier‑1 supplier audit schedule reduces audit friction, late penalties, and contract risk while unlocking greener routing or preferred‑supplier pricing.
Practical deliverables include a traceability gap analysis, a pilot DPP for a representative product or SKU, supplier risk scoring and a shrink‑wrap of documents required for major customers or tenders. These items shrink the cost of regulatory responses, speed audits, and protect top‑line access to environmentally sensitive buyers.
When cybersecurity and sustainability are treated as operational levers rather than one‑off compliance chores, they both reduce cost and strengthen valuation: fewer incidents, lower audit friction, and clearer, defendable claims in due diligence. With those controls in place, you can then translate sector‑level playbooks into targeted 7‑figure opportunities for specific business models and operating footprints.
Thank you for reading Diligize’s blog!
Are you looking for strategic advise?
Subscribe to our newsletter!
Sector playbooks: where a cost savings consultant finds 7‑figure wins
Manufacturing: supply chain planning, factory analytics, and predictive maintenance
In manufacturing the largest near‑term dollar opportunities come from aligning demand and supply, squeezing waste out of production, and turning unplanned downtime into predictable maintenance cycles. Consultants focus on a small set of high‑impact pilots: SKU rationalization and multi‑echelon inventory fixes, targeted factory analytics to remove bottlenecks, and condition‑based maintenance for high‑value assets. Deliverables are pragmatic — a prioritized list of SKU/asset targets, a short pilot plan with measurable KPIs, and an implementation playbook that transfers capability to the plant team so savings persist beyond the engagement.
Investment services: advisor co‑pilots, client‑service automation, -50% cost per account
“Advisor co‑pilots and client‑service automation have been shown to cut cost‑per‑account by ~50% while saving advisors ~10–15 hours per week.” Investment Services Industry Challenges & AI-Powered Solutions — D-LAB research
Translate that potential into action by automating routine client work (reporting, document prep, KYC refreshes), embedding co‑pilots into portfolio construction and client conversations, and reengineering onboarding to eliminate manual handoffs. Typical outputs are automated workflows that reduce headcount pressure, configurable co‑pilot prompts that lift advisor throughput, and a measured reduction in service costs per account that makes margin expansion possible without sacrificing client experience.
Software and portfolio companies: retention analytics, engineering co‑pilots, support deflection
For SaaS and software‑heavy portfolios the highest‑value plays cluster around retention and engineering productivity. Start with retention analytics to identify at‑risk cohorts and build targeted interventions; add engineering co‑pilots to accelerate delivery and cut review cycles; and deploy conversational agents and knowledge‑base automation to deflect tickets and reduce support costs. The combination raises renewal rates, shrinks support spend, and increases feature velocity — all of which compound into seven‑figure value for mid‑sized product organisations.
Across sectors the pattern is the same: pick the handful of high‑leverage levers, validate them with tight pilots, and hand the client a repeatable rollout that converts one‑time wins into sustainable margin. That operational clarity is what lets leadership move quickly from pilot to scale — and it’s also the foundation for a successful consultant engagement when you next align selection, readiness and governance with the savings agenda.
Choosing the right consultant—and setting them up to win
Selection checklist: category depth, security posture, proof of savings, pricing model
Choose a consultant who matches the problem, not just the pitch. Prioritise firms with demonstrable depth in the specific category you need (SaaS optimisation, logistics, energy, or manufacturing analytics) and recent case studies with measurable outcomes. Ask for referenceable pilots, not just slideware.
Validate their security and compliance posture early: confirm how they handle data access, what controls they require, and whether they will work under your policies or request exceptions. Security lapses during discovery derail projects and add hidden cost.
Clarify commercial alignment up front. The best models combine a modest upfront fee for diagnostics with a success element tied to recurring, verified savings; avoid vendors that promise vague upside without clear measurement rules. Insist on an agreed verification method so both sides know how savings are counted and paid.
2‑week readiness: the data exports that unlock quick wins (AP ledger, contracts, usage, energy, freight, machine logs)
Speed matters. In the first two weeks the consultant needs a compact set of exports and access points to run high‑signal diagnostics: accounts payable and invoice histories, supplier and vendor contracts, subscription and licence inventories, usage logs (cloud, SaaS, telemetry), energy consumption or utility bills, freight manifests and routing summaries, and any available machine or production logs.
Prepare a small access team: a technical lead for systems and an operational owner for each cost category (finance for AP, IT for SaaS, operations for logistics/plant). Bundle the data with a short data dictionary (fields, units, refresh cadence) and a named point of contact for clarifying questions — this reduces back‑and‑forth and keeps pilots moving.
Governance cadence: owners, dashboards, and savings verification in a high‑rates environment
Turn discovery into durable change with clear governance. For each identified lever assign an owner, a measurable KPI, and a 30/60/90 day implementation milestone. Weekly tactical standups run by the consultant should feed a monthly steering meeting owned by the CFO or COO where verified savings and blockers are reviewed.
Insist on simple, auditable dashboards that show baseline, intervention, and verified run‑rate impact. Verification should include reconciliation to ledger entries (for cost reductions or credits), sampling of automated actions (for workflow automation), and a short post‑implementation audit window to ensure savings persist.
Finally, set a handover plan: after pilot validation, transition operational control and monitoring to an internal team, keep a short fixed‑term support contract to guard against regression, and schedule a 6‑month health check. That sequence converts consultant gains into sustained margin improvement and protects the organisation as market and interest‑rate pressures evolve.