Cost Cutting Consultants: What They Do, ROI to Expect, and a 90-Day Plan

What cost cutting consultants actually do in 2025

Rapid spend and contract scan to find waste

Consultants start by ingesting procurement, AP, and contract data to create a searchable, normalized spend layer. Using spend taxonomy, anomaly detection and fast-contract parsing, they flag duplicate suppliers, unused subscriptions, odd billing patterns, and near-term renewals that deserve immediate attention. Deliverables are a prioritized “quick-win” list, an actionable savings pipeline, and a clean baseline you can measure against.

Vendor consolidation and renegotiation playbook

With a cleaned spend dataset, consultants map strategic vs tactical suppliers, identify consolidation opportunities, and build negotiation playbooks (benchmarks, concession levers, bundling options, and walkaway positions). They prepare RFPs, run competitive bids where appropriate, and help structure revised commercial terms and SLAs that lock in measurable savings without breaking continuity. They also design vendor transition plans so consolidation doesn’t create service gaps.

Process fixes: remove bottlenecks, rework, handoffs

Beyond contracts, interview- and data-driven process diagnostics reveal rework, approvals, and handoffs that add cost. Consultants run value-stream or process-mining exercises to diagnose root causes, then pilot simplified workflows, standard operating procedures, and small role changes that eliminate repetitive steps. The focus is on repeatable fixes that reduce cycle time and labor cost while preserving—or improving—quality.

AI and automation hunt: where software beats manual work

Teams scan for high-volume, rule-based or knowledge-work tasks that are prime for RPA, workflow automation, or generative-AI copilots. They build a prioritized automation backlog (impact, complexity, and risk), deliver rapid pilots or low-code proofs of concept, and create a deployment playbook for scale. A key output is the build-vs-buy decision framework plus a change plan so automation actually frees up capacity rather than shifting hidden work elsewhere.

Risk controls: cut costs without inviting cyber or compliance trouble

Cost reduction doesn’t mean cutting governance. Consultants layer risk controls onto every proposal: vendor security reviews, contract clauses for data protection, compliance checklists, and minimum staffing thresholds for critical functions. They also define rollback triggers and monitoring KPIs so any implemented cut can be quickly reversed if it increases operational or regulatory risk.

Sustainability as a savings lever (energy, waste, materials)

Energy audits, waste-reduction pilots, and material-efficiency initiatives are treated as cost-reduction projects with measurable ROI. Consultants quantify consumption drivers, recommend no/low-cost behavioral and process changes, and model capital vs operational trade-offs for efficiency investments. The result is a pipeline of sustainability actions that lower bills and often improve compliance and brand value at the same time.

Across all these levers consultants package work into a short roadmap: immediate “rip-the-bandage” actions, 30–90 day pilots, and a 6–12 month scale plan with owners, KPIs, and reporting. That makes savings auditable and sustainable—and next, we’ll cover how to decide whether to bring in external help and what returns you should expect from doing so.

When to hire them—and the ROI to expect

Signals you’re ready: margin squeeze, high interest rates, supply chain shocks

Bring in external cost-cutting expertise when internal fixes have stopped moving the needle. Common signals include sustained margin compression despite revenue holding steady, rising financing costs or loan covenants that tighten cash flow, repeated supply‑chain disruptions that spike working capital, or a string of one-off cost shocks (tariffs, regulatory changes, major vendor failures). Other triggers are: leadership wanting rapid, auditable savings, a backlog of renewals and subscriptions, or an M&A agenda where value needs to be unlocked quickly.

Typical savings ranges by category (energy, logistics, telecom, software)

Savings vary by category, maturity of the organisation, and how much effort leadership will commit to implementation. As a rough rule of thumb consultants commonly target:

– Energy and utilities: low-investment measures and behavioral changes typically save single-digit to low‑teens percent on bills; capital projects can push returns higher but take longer.

– Logistics and warehousing: route optimization, network rationalization, and carrier rebids can often deliver mid-single-digit to low‑20s percent reductions in total logistics spend.

– Telecom and cloud/software: contract cleanups, license recovery, and rightsizing commonly yield double‑digit savings (often in the 10–30% band) on telecom and SaaS line items.

– Procurement and indirects: category management, demand reduction and vendor consolidation can show quick wins in the high single digits and scalable savings into the mid‑teens.

These ranges are illustrative — every organisation has different levers available. The fastest wins are usually contract cleanups and subscription rationalization; deeper process and automation work takes a bit longer but often increases the sustainable savings multiple.

Fee models explained: success-based, fixed-fee, hybrid

Consultants price cost-reduction work in three common ways:

– Success-based: the consultant takes a share of verified, realised savings. Advantage: low upfront cost and alignment on outcomes. Downside: may incentivize one-off or timing-dependent actions rather than sustainable change.

– Fixed-fee (time-and-materials or project fee): predictable costs for scoped work. Advantage: clarity on budget and broader diagnostics; downside: client bears execution risk and must own follow-through.

– Hybrid: a modest upfront fee plus a smaller success fee. This balances commitment from both sides and is currently a popular structure for short engagements with measurable targets.

When evaluating offers, insist on three things regardless of fee model: a clear baseline and measurement method for savings, an audit trail that proves savings were realised, and agreed ownership for implementation so savings aren’t “paper” numbers that evaporate after the consultant leaves.

Finally, match the model to the problem: use success-based for narrowly scoped, easy-to-measure categories (vendor rebates, subscription cleanup); choose fixed-fee or hybrid for broader transformation work that requires diagnostics, pilots and change management.

With a clear readiness signal, realistic category expectations, and the right pricing model, hiring external help can accelerate measurable savings while protecting service and compliance. Next, we’ll dig into the sector playbooks that tend to produce the fastest, highest‑confidence wins and how those levers differ by industry.

Industry playbooks that move the needle fast

Manufacturing: predictive maintenance, process optimization, and supply chain planning

“50% reduction in unplanned machine downtime, 20-30% increase in machine lifetime.” Manufacturing Industry Challenges & AI-Powered Solutions — D-LAB research

Playbook: start with asset telemetry and a focused predictive-maintenance pilot on the highest‑cost equipment. Pair simple condition‑based alerts with a prescriptive workflow so technicians know exactly what to do when a signal fires. Parallel that with process‑mining on the production line to remove bottlenecks and with inventory‑optimisation for critical spares.

Why it moves the needle: fewer breakdowns reduce emergency repairs, lost production and expedited freight. Combined with energy-efficiency measures on high-consumption equipment, these fixes produce both near-term cash savings and longer-term cost avoidance.

Insurance: claims automation and underwriting copilots

“40-50% reduction in claims processing time (Ema), (Vedant Sharma).” Insurance Industry Challenges & AI-Powered Solutions — D-LAB research

“30-50% reduction in fraudulent payouts (Anmol Sahai).” Insurance Industry Challenges & AI-Powered Solutions — D-LAB research

Playbook: automate intake, triage and first‑pass adjudication for routine claims while routing complex cases to human specialists supported by AI summaries. For underwriting, deploy copilots that pre-fill forms, summarise risk documents, and propose pricing bands—freeing experienced underwriters for judgment calls only.

Why it moves the needle: faster claims reduce admin costs and improve customer retention; automated fraud detection cuts payouts. The twin effect is lower operational cost and better combined ratio without across‑the‑board rate increases.

Investment services: advisor co-pilots and client assistants

“50% reduction in cost per account (Lindsey Wilkinson).” Investment Services Industry Challenges & AI-Powered Solutions — D-LAB research

“10-15 hours saved per week by financial advisors (Joyce Moullakis).” Investment Services Industry Challenges & AI-Powered Solutions — D-LAB research

“90% boost in information processing efficiency (Samuel Shen).” Investment Services Industry Challenges & AI-Powered Solutions — D-LAB research

Playbook: deploy advisor co‑pilots to automate client reporting, portfolio rebalancing suggestions, and prospect research. Add client‑facing assistants for routine queries and onboarding to cut service costs. Start with a small set of advisors and rolling pilots to measure time saved and client NPS impact.

Why it moves the needle: saving advisor time scales directly into lower cost-per-account or the ability to grow AUM without proportional headcount increases—especially valuable in fee‑pressured markets.

Cross-industry quick wins: utilities, shipping, waste, and telecom contract clean-up

Playbook: run horizontal, short sprints that identify the low-friction, high-dollar opportunities every company has—telecom and software license rationalization, carrier rebids in shipping, energy procurement renegotiation, and waste-stream optimization. These are often measurable within 30–90 days and require minimal structural change.

Why it moves the needle: cross-industry quick wins are usually low-risk, fast-to-implement and produce auditable, bankable savings that fund deeper transformation pilots.

Each industry playbook pairs a measured pilot (to prove outcomes) with an ops plan that locks savings into contracts and roles—so the gains aren’t temporary. With those playbooks proven, the next step is picking a partner who can both diagnose and implement at scale while preserving security and service levels.

Thank you for reading Diligize’s blog!
Are you looking for strategic advise?
Subscribe to our newsletter!

How to choose the right cost cutting consultant

Proof of savings: baseline, methodology, auditability

Insist on a clear baseline and a documented measurement approach before any work begins. That means: a defined spend or KPI baseline period, the exact metrics that will be used to claim savings, and the method for attributing changes to the consultant’s work (vs. seasonality or market movements). Ask for sample calculations and an audit trail: transaction-level evidence, contract comparisons, and timelines showing when savings start and recur. Where possible require independent verification or an agreed-upon reconciliation process so “paper” savings can’t be retconned later.

Sector expertise and a usable data/AI stack

Pick consultants who know your industry’s unique levers and reporting conventions—sector fluency shortens ramp time. Equally important: they should come with a practical data and tools playbook, not just slideware. That means repeatable templates for spend ingestion, contract parsing, process mining or automation pilots, and a plan to integrate with your ERP, procurement, or cloud systems. Confirm they can work with the quality of data you have today and have a clear remediation approach if it’s messy.

Change management and implementation muscle (not just powerpoints)

Distinguish thinkers from doers. The right firm pairs analysis with implementation: project managers, change agents embedded with your teams, training plans, and documented owner handoffs. Ask for examples of how they maintained savings after handover—what governance, KPIs, and incentives they set to ensure actions stuck. Prefer partners who propose small pilots with measurable success criteria before scaling, rather than sweeping, one-off recommendations.

Security, compliance, and vendor-risk guardrails

Cost programs often touch sensitive data and critical suppliers. Validate the consultant’s security posture (data handling policies, encryption, NDAs, and, where relevant, SOC 2 or equivalent controls). Confirm how they assess vendor risk and what contractual protections they require when introducing new suppliers or switching vendors. Make sure regulatory or compliance obligations (data residency, industry rules) are embedded into any proposed savings action.

Transparent pricing, references, and no vendor kickbacks

Ask for detailed pricing scenarios—what’s included in a fixed fee, what triggers success fees, and how disputes over measurement are resolved. Request client references with similar scope and ask specific questions: Were the savings realized and sustained? Who owned implementation? Were there any surprises in cost or timeline? Also probe commercial relationships: do they accept referral fees from technology vendors or resellers, and how would that influence recommendations?

Red flags: slash-and-burn cuts, no data access, vague ROI

Watch for consultants who promise dramatic, one-size-fits-all cuts without looking at your data, demand full payment up-front with no milestones, or refuse to share their measurement methodology. Other red flags: reluctance to grant client teams audit access, recommendations that remove essential controls or staff without fallback plans, and vague ROI claims with no traceable evidence. If a proposal relies mainly on headcount layoffs or single‑period accounting tricks, escalate caution.

Use these criteria to run a short, structured selection process: shortlist by sector fit and toolset, validate outcomes with references and sample workbooks, negotiate clear measurement and governance terms, then pilot with defined success gates. Once you’ve chosen a partner with the right mix of diagnostic rigor and delivery capability, the practical next step is to run a tightly staged plan that grabs data, proves quick wins, and locks sustainable savings into contracts and roles.

Your 90-day savings plan

Days 1–14: data grab and baseline (spend, contracts, usage, KPIs)

Kick off with a tightly scoped data ingest and baseline. Designate a single client sponsor and a small data/ops pod (finance, procurement, IT) to grant access and resolve blockers. Pull AP, PO, contract, subscription, and usage data for the previous 12 months where possible and map to a simple spend taxonomy. Deliverables: a validated baseline of recurring spend and renewals, a prioritized list of top 50 suppliers/subscriptions by dollar value and risk, and a one‑page executive snapshot showing the highest-probability saving opportunities. Key KPI: baseline completeness and time-to-first-insight (goal: initial pipeline in 10 business days).

Weeks 3–4: quick-win sprints—cancel, right-size, renegotiate

Run 1–3 parallel sprint teams focused on high-velocity levers: license & subscription rationalization, duplicate suppliers, contract renewals, and low-hanging procurement rebates. Each sprint is time-boxed (7–10 days) and follows the same template: diagnose, propose, secure signoff, and implement. Standardize approval thresholds so small operational changes can be executed without executive approval. Deliverables: signed change orders or termination confirmations, first-month cash savings forecast, and a short implementation log showing who executed each action. Key KPI: verified savings realised within the invoice cycle.

Month 2: pilot AI automations and run vendor negotiations

Use month two to validate mid-weight levers. Launch one or two automation pilots (e.g., invoice matching, claims triage, contract parsing) using low-code or off-the-shelf tools to prove time and cost reduction. Simultaneously run consolidated vendor negotiations for the largest categories identified in the baseline. For each pilot, define success criteria up front (time saved, error reduction, cost avoidance) and a rollback plan. Deliverables: pilot results deck with measured KPIs, renegotiated contracts with effective dates, and a risk-adjusted savings model for scaling. Key KPI: pilot ROI and percentage of negotiated savings contractually committed.

Month 3: lock savings into contracts and dashboards; set owner and cadence

In month three convert temporary wins into durable savings. Update contracts to capture price, volume, and SLA commitments; implement spend controls (purchase approvals, rightsizing rules); and build a simple savings dashboard that shows realised vs forecast savings by category and owner. Assign permanent owners for each savings stream and set a cadence for review (weekly for execution owners, monthly for executives). Deliverables: signed contract amendments, an operational dashboard with live data feeds, and a RACI for ongoing governance. Key KPI: percent of projected annualised savings locked in via contracts or governance.

Guardrails: don’t cut maintenance, cybersecurity, or customer support quality

Embed guardrails throughout the 90 days. Create a “do not de-stage” list that contains critical maintenance, cybersecurity, compliance, and customer-facing functions and require any recommendation that touches those areas to include a risk assessment, fallback plan, and monitoring triggers. Establish minimum staffing or SLA thresholds and require a pre‑mortem for any proposed cut that could impact uptime, safety, or regulatory compliance. Deliverable: a risk register with triggers and an emergency rollback playbook. Key KPI: zero service-level incidents attributable to cost actions.

End the 90 days with a concise handover packet: baseline, savings realised, contracts amended, dashboard links, owners and cadence, and a three-month roadmap for scale. That makes the savings measurable, repeatable and owned—and sets you up to evaluate which broader transformation bets to fund next.