Why this matters now
Private equity firms know that deals live and die on trust: trust from investors, from buyers at exit, and from regulators. When compliance is treated as a checkbox, it creates uncertainty — slower diligences, surprise liabilities, and lower exit prices. When it’s treated as a discipline, it reduces regulatory risk and makes a firm (and its portfolio) more attractive to buyers and LPs.
This post shows how thoughtful compliance consulting does more than avoid fines. It turns compliance into a valuation lever: clarifying fee and expense practices, tightening controls around material non‑public information, hardening cyber and data governance, and building buyer‑ready evidence that speeds deals and lifts prices.
Three simple ways compliance adds value
- Fewer surprises in diligence: clean records, substantiation files, and consistent LP reporting mean fewer issues found during sell‑side or buy‑side reviews.
- Lower regulatory risk: robust policies and exam readiness reduce the chance of costly investigations and remediation that sap time and cash.
- Stronger exit optionality: documented controls, SOC/ISO readiness, and automated evidence capture increase buyer confidence and can improve deal outcomes.
Throughout the article we’ll walk through what modern PE compliance must cover today, practical ways to turn controls into evidence and value, a maturity map to see where you stand, and a no‑nonsense 12‑month roadmap you can act on. If you’d like, I can add current statistics and source links to underscore the scale of regulatory and cyber risk — tell me and I’ll pull the latest figures and cite the sources.
What private equity compliance consulting must cover now
Fee and expenses: allocation, offsets, and timely disclosure
Consulting must start with a clear, fund‑level fee and expense framework: documented allocation rules, approved expense categories, and a repeatable process for applying offsets and credits. Advisors should map every expense to the governing documents (LPA, management agreements) and produce reconciliations that tie accounting entries to disclosures made to LPs.
Key deliverables include an expense policy (who pays what and when), standardized calculation templates, an exceptions log, and a routine audit of third‑party charges (consultants, placement agents, IT vendors). Consultants should also establish an approval workflow and retention schedule so disclosures are accurate and exam‑ready at the fund and adviser level.
Conflicts of interest and co‑investment allocation
Advisers need enforceable policies covering how opportunities, allocations and preferential economics are handled. That means documented allocation methodologies, objective allocation committees or algorithms, pre‑deal allocation approvals, and contemporaneous records of who was offered what, and why.
Good consulting work will: identify and remediate structural conflicts in incentive arrangements; implement pre‑approval rules and escalation paths for related‑party transactions; and build transparent reporting to the board and LPs so allocation decisions can be reconstructed and defended during diligence or an exam.
MNPI controls: deal teams, expert networks, and data rooms
Material non‑public information (MNPI) risk is concentrated where deal teams, advisors and external experts interact. Consultants must design controls that limit MNPI exposure: role‑based access to data rooms, strict vendor onboarding for expert networks, documented engagement protocols, and training for deal teams on information barriers.
Effective controls include least‑privilege access models, time‑boxed data‑room permissions, logging and automated alerts for anomalous downloads, pre‑engagement NDAs for experts, and documented supervision of external communications. Also important: playbooks for handling inadvertent disclosures and retained evidence that MNPI was properly contained.
SEC Marketing Rule: performance, testimonials, and substantiation files
Advisers must be able to substantiate any public or investor‑facing claims. Consulting should cover policies for performance presentations and marketing materials, a central repository for substantiation files, and a compliance review gate that signs off before distribution. For testimonials or endorsements, procedures must document consent, compensation and required disclosures.
Practical outputs include templates and approved language for performance reporting, a versioned marketing library, automated capture of source data used in calculations, and a periodic review program that refreshes substantiation files and retains the audit trail required to support claims to LPs or regulators.
Cybersecurity and data governance: incident response, vendor risk, and recordkeeping
Cyber risk is a compliance risk. Consultants should assess the current security posture, design an incident response plan that aligns to business‑critical processes, and build vendor risk management to control third‑party exposures. That work must also address data classification, retention policies and recordkeeping obligations for both the adviser and portfolio companies.
Core actions include a prioritized remediation roadmap (critical fixes first), tabletop exercises for incident response, integration of vendor security questionnaires into procurement, and logging/archival standards to ensure records can be produced for diligence, audits or regulatory requests. The goal is to reduce detection and response time while preserving forensically sound evidence.
LP reporting, side letters, and valuation governance
Transparent and consistent reporting to LPs is a cornerstone of trust and valuation defense. Consulting should standardize LP reporting packs, centralize side‑letter tracking, and enforce a governance model for valuations (valuation committee charter, methodologies, and documentation). Every preferred term or carve‑out must be visible in a master side‑letter register and reflected in NAV and carried‑interest calculations.
Deliverables include an automated side‑letter log with change history, a valuation policy that defines inputs and approvals, evidentiary templates for fair value judgements, and a cadence for briefing the audit committee and key LPs. These controls reduce surprises at exit and simplify buyer due diligence.
When these areas are covered together — documented fee practices, conflict controls, MNPI containment, marketing substantiation, cyber and data governance, and LP/valuation hygiene — compliance stops being just a cost of doing business and becomes durable proof of stewardship. Next, we will show how to convert that proof into a value‑creation capability using practical tech, data controls and buyer‑ready evidence that strengthen exit optionality.
Turn compliance into value: AI, data controls, and buyer‑ready proof
Protect IP and data with ISO 27002, SOC 2, and NIST CSF 2.0
“IP & Data Protection: ISO 27002, SOC 2, and NIST frameworks defend against value-eroding breaches, derisking investments; compliance readiness boosts buyer trust.” Portfolio Company Exit Preparation Technologies to Enhance Valuation — D-LAB research
Start with a mapped, risk‑ranked control set that ties framework controls (ISO 27002 / SOC 2 / NIST CSF) to the assets buyers care about: IP, customer PII, revenue systems. Run a gap assessment, prioritise remediation (patching, identity controls, encryption, logging) and capture evidence in a single, searchable evidence store so you can produce audit‑quality artifacts quickly.
Quantify the upside when you can: readiness reduces breach risk and buyer friction (the library notes the average cost of a data breach was $4.24M in 2023 and GDPR fines can reach ~4% of revenue), so control maturity converts directly into deal optionality and higher exit multiples.
Automate testing and evidence capture with AI assistants and GRC workflows
“AI assistants and co‑pilots can accelerate evidence capture for compliance — delivering up to 300x faster data processing and 10x quicker research screening — enabling automated, auditable GRC workflows that make exam readiness and deal diligence far less disruptive.” Portfolio Company Exit Preparation Technologies to Enhance Valuation — D-LAB research
Use lightweight AI co‑pilots to harvest proofs of control: configuration snapshots, access reviews, approval emails, and test results. Feed those outputs into a GRC platform that automates test schedules, generates attestations, and stores chained evidence (who ran the test, when, and the results). That approach turns manual evidence hunts into a repeatable pipeline that surfaces readiness metrics for boards and buyers.
Reduce churn and improve NRR via customer sentiment analytics that withstand diligence
Instrument product and CX signals into a single customer health model that survives diligence. Deploy sentiment analytics and a customer‑success playbook so you can demonstrate measurable improvements (for example, GenAI analytics and success platforms in the library show churn reductions up to ~30% and revenue uplifts ~20%).
When buyer teams ask for proof of growth quality, hand them analyzable dashboards plus the raw evidence: ticket volumes, retention cohort tables, playbook actions and outcomes, and annotations tying interventions to LTV or renewal wins. That makes customer metrics defensible and increases the credibility of revenue forecasts.
Communications surveillance with NLP to flag MNPI and risky claims
Deploy NLP‑driven surveillance over email, chat and recorded calls to surface potential MNPI, risky forward‑looking statements, or testimonial misuse early. Combine keyword models with anomaly detection on access patterns and trading activity so alerts are triaged into a documented compliance workflow.
Capture the review trail for every alert (initial score, reviewer note, escalation outcome) and store redacted snapshots in your evidence repo. This creates an auditable chain that shows regulators or acquirers you detected, reviewed and resolved communications risks in a timely, repeatable way.
Commercial controls that pass Marketing Rule review: pricing logic and recommendation engines
Build marketing and pricing controls into the commercial stack rather than bolt them on at the last minute. Document pricing logic, training data, and A/B test results for recommendation engines; version and sign off models used to generate performance claims or forecasts.
Maintain substantiation files that link public performance claims back to source data, calculation scripts and reviewer approvals. When calculations, testimonials or product claims are supported by reproducible evidence, marketing becomes a value signal instead of a diligence liability.
Put together, these steps convert compliance from a checklist into a competitive advantage: faster, cleaner diligence, fewer surprises in buyer Q&A, and demonstrable de‑risking that lifts valuation. With the tech and operating model in place, the next step is to locate where you sit on a maturity map and choose the fixes that move the needle fastest.
PE compliance maturity map: where you stand and what to fix first
A practical maturity map turns ambiguity into priorities. Use three lenses—regulatory baseline, operational controls, and buyer/diligence readiness—to place your firm on a short scale from “foundational” to “global.” The point is not perfection today but a prioritized sequence of fixes that shrink regulatory risk and produce buyer‑ready evidence.
Emerging manager: registration readiness, core policies, code of ethics
If you are newly formed or managing a small set of funds, focus on the must‑have building blocks: determine registration and licensing obligations, adopt a concise code of ethics and personal‑trading rules, and publish core policies (compliance, privacy, AML/CTF, conflicts). Establish a named compliance owner, a simple conflicts register, and a minimum evidence store for filings, approvals and employee attestations.
Priority fixes: confirm registration posture, finalize and distribute the code of ethics, implement basic access controls and record retention, and create a one‑page compliance playbook for partners and key hires.
Scaling adviser: Marketing Rule hygiene and fee/expense transparency
Growing firms must standardize how they make claims, manage fees and answer LP questions. Build a marketing review gate, a substantiation library that ties performance and testimonial claims to source data, and a repeatable fee/expense allocation process that maps to fund documents. Centralize side‑letter tracking and ensure NAV and carried‑interest calculations reconcile with any bespoke terms.
Priority fixes: an approved marketing‑review workflow, a single source of truth for fee allocations, and an exceptions log for side letters and off‑cycle adjustments—so every material disclosure is reproducible on demand.
Global platform: cross‑border frameworks and AML buildout ahead of 2026
Firms operating across jurisdictions need an overlay of cross‑border governance: a privacy and data‑transfer map, locally compliant disclosure processes, and an AML/CTF framework that scales with portfolio footprint. Strengthen vendor due diligence and sanctions screening, align KYC standards across regions, and codify escalation paths for foreign regulatory interactions.
Priority fixes: enterprise‑level policies for privacy and transfers, a vendor‑risk baseline with remediation SLAs, and an AML playbook (risk assessment, transaction monitoring, SAR processes) that can be operationalised across portfolio companies.
90‑day stabilization plan: close gaps, capture evidence, brief the IC and LPs
When speed matters, replace open‑ended projects with a 90‑day stabilization plan that delivers defensible evidence and board‑level briefings. Phase the work: rapid assessment and prioritisation; remediation of critical gaps (policy, access, or material controls); and a capture sprint that codifies evidence, produces reconciliations and prepares talking points for the investment committee and LPs.
Typical cadence: weeks 1–2 perform a gap and evidence inventory; weeks 3–6 remediate the highest‑impact findings and lock down controls; weeks 7–10 assemble substantiation files, run tabletop/mocks and collect attestations; weeks 11–12 produce the executive stabilization report, brief the IC and prepare LP Q&A materials.
Use this maturity map as a decision tool: pick the level that most closely matches your firm, execute the short list of priority fixes, and convert patchwork compliance into consistent, auditable proof. Once stabilized, you can translate those efforts into repeatable deliverables and engagement models that an external consultant or internal team can operationalize for long‑term value.
Thank you for reading Diligize’s blog!
Are you looking for strategic advise?
Subscribe to our newsletter!
What great compliance consultants actually deliver
Operating model: fractional CCO, co‑sourced team, or fully outsourced
Top consultants don’t sell one‑size‑fits‑all packages — they present operating options tied to governance, cost and speed. Deliverables include role definitions (fractional CCO job description, RACI matrices), a staffing plan (FTEs, skill mix, escalation routes), and a service‑level agreement that codifies response times, deliverables and reporting cadence.
They also provide a transition playbook: onboarding checklist, knowledge transfer plan, retained vs. delegated task split, and a budgeted three‑month run‑rate so the executive team can compare internal hire versus co‑sourcing or full outsourcing.
Exam readiness: mock exams, sweep response kits, and board reporting
Effective consultants prepare you for regulatory scrutiny by running realistic mock exams and producing a repeatable evidence package. Typical outputs are a findings dashboard, priority remediation list, and a “sweep kit” (document templates, sample responses, and a timeline for producing missing artifacts).
They also build board‑ready materials: a concise issues heatmap, status of open findings, testing evidence, and an executive narrative that links remediation to residual risk. That combination reduces last‑minute scrambles and shortens regulator Q&A cycles.
Tech stack blueprint: code of ethics automation, comms archiving, trade surveillance, vendor DD
Consultants translate policy into an implementable tech stack. Deliverables typically include a mapped architecture (recommended vendors, integration points, data flows), a prioritized procurement shortlist, and a phased implementation roadmap with budget and resource estimates.
They supply configuration playbooks for critical capabilities — automated attestations for the code of ethics, retention and search criteria for communications archiving, rulesets for trade and comms surveillance, and a vendor‑due‑diligence template with minimum control thresholds.
Portfolio company oversight: cybersecurity uplift, data maps, and ESG essentials
Good advisers extend governance to portfolio companies with repeatable, scaled programs. Expect a template‑based approach: a cybersecurity uplift plan (baseline assessment, prioritized fixes, evidence capture), standardized data inventories and data‑flow maps, and a minimum ESG checklist aligned to buyer expectations.
Deliverables are practical and auditable — remediation sprints, consolidated evidence packs for exit diligence, and a governance playbook that defines when portfolio companies must elevate issues to fund compliance or the investment committee.
Training that changes behavior: scenario drills, attestations, and metrics
Training must move beyond slide decks. Leading consultants deliver scenario‑based drills (trade‑surveillance incidents, inadvertent MNPI disclosures, cyber‑breach tabletop exercises), short role‑specific microlearning modules, and formal attestations to reinforce accountability.
They measure impact with metrics: completion and competence rates, incident‑response times in exercises, and reductions in control exceptions. Those metrics are packaged into recurring reporting so leadership can see behaviour change, not just training attendance.
When delivered together — an appropriate operating model, exam readiness tooling, a clear tech blueprint, portfolio oversight standards and practical training — compliance becomes repeatable, measurable and defensible. That foundation makes it straightforward to sequence work into quarterly projects, allocate budget and set milestones for the year ahead, so teams can move from remediation to sustained compliance performance.
A 12‑month, no‑drama compliance roadmap for PE firms
Q1: risk assessment, policy refresh, fee/expense review, Marketing Rule substantiation file
Kick off with a focused, senior‑sponsored risk assessment that inventories regulatory exposures, material policies and evidence gaps. Deliverables for the quarter: a one‑page risk heatmap, updated core policies (conflicts, code of ethics, record retention), a reconciled fee & expense playbook, and a single substantiation file for any marketing/performance claims.
Practical steps: assign owners and SLAs, run targeted interviews with deal, finance and marketing teams, extract and normalise source data for fees and performance, and capture every supporting document in a searchable evidence store. Quick wins: patch top 3 high‑impact policy gaps and publish an executive briefing for the IC.
Q2: SOC 2 or ISO 27002 readiness, data inventory, and vendor risk reviews
Turn controls into proof. Use Q2 to complete a data inventory and vendor risk baseline and to scope a security framework readiness track (SOC 2 or ISO). Deliverables: a prioritized remediation backlog, a mapped data inventory (owners, sensitivity, locations), and a vendor risk matrix with minimum control requirements and remediation SLAs.
Practical steps: run automated scans where possible, complete high‑risk vendor questionnaires, implement basic logging/backup checks, and create evidence templates for common audit asks. KPI: reduce critical control gaps month‑over‑month and demonstrate at least one remediated control with test evidence.
Q3: AI‑enabled monitoring (personal trading, comms, MNPI) and LP reporting automation
Move from manual detection to scalable monitoring. Pilot AI‑enabled tools for personal‑trading surveillance, communications screening and MNPI detection; run the tool in parallel with manual review to validate precision and tune rules. Concurrently, automate LP reporting templates and the side‑letter register to reduce manual reconciliation work.
Deliverables: a monitored pilot with documented false‑positive rates and tuning notes, an automated LP reporting workflow that pulls source data and produces reconciled packs, and an incident classification and escalation playbook. Practical steps: define alert thresholds, embed human review queues, and capture chain‑of‑custody evidence for flagged incidents.
Q4: incident tabletop, mock SEC exam, and AML/CFT program design for upcoming rules
Close the year with resilience testing and readiness rehearsals. Run an end‑to‑end incident tabletop (cyber + data breach + MNPI), perform a mock regulator exam covering the year’s high‑risk areas, and design or refresh an AML/CFT program aligned to your jurisdictional footprint.
Deliverables: tabletop after‑action report with owners and timelines, a mock exam findings log and sweep kit for rapid response, and an AML program playbook (risk assessment, monitoring triggers, SAR process). Practical steps: secure board participation for the tabletop, validate document production speed during the mock exam, and obtain executive sign‑off on the AML roadmap.
Execution notes and governance: run the roadmap as quarterly sprints with a monthly steering checkpoint, a single owner for evidence collection, and a short executive dashboard showing remediation velocity and proof‑readiness. Budget for a small, dedicated program manager and leverage a consultant or co‑sourced CCO for peak activities to avoid internal disruption.
Once the year delivers documented controls, repeatable evidence capture and validated monitoring, you’ll have a defensible posture and concrete outputs ready to hand to advisers or acquirers — next, we’ll describe the practical engagement models and outputs that make those gains sustainable and audit‑ready.