Financial services firms risk losing 15-20% of expected returns from acquisitions due to overlooked technology costs, often stemming from inadequate due diligence. Key hidden expenses include technical debt, cybersecurity, regulatory compliance, AI integration, and talent acquisition. The article advocates for a robust AI Technology Due Diligence framework to identify these costs early, ensuring accurate valuations and improved investment returns. By addressing these hidden costs, private equity firms can enhance their investment strategies and mitigate risks.
Financial services firms could see 15-20% of anticipated returns vanish due to overlooked technology expenses in acquisitions. This value erosion often stems from inadequate technology due diligence during the investment process [1]. For private equity firms focused on maximising returns and minimising risk, these hidden costs pose a significant threat to investment performance.
This article provides a framework for identifying and mitigating these hidden costs through AI Technology Due Diligence, enabling more accurate valuations and protected investment portfolios.
Executive Summary: This article examines the critical hidden technology costs affecting private equity TCO, including technical debt, cybersecurity requirements, regulatory compliance, AI integration, and talent acquisition. We provide a framework for comprehensive AI Technology Due Diligence to identify these costs early, enabling more accurate valuations and improved investment returns.
Uncovering Overlooked Technology Expenses
Unexpected technology costs frequently surface in private equity acquisitions, particularly during post-acquisition integration. Incompatible legacy systems or systems requiring costly upgrades are common culprits [2]. These discoveries quickly lead to budget overruns, often absent from initial due diligence.
Market analysis highlights the scale. Private equity firms recently executed £5 billion in takeovers on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM), a substantial 62% of total M&A deal value [1]. This activity underscores the need for thorough technology assessment. With such capital at stake, seemingly minor hidden tech costs can significantly impact investment portfolios.
The drive for rapid consolidation can lead to rushed technology due diligence, increasing the risk of overlooking critical issues like legacy system integration, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and technical debt. These issues often surface post-deal, skewing the projected TCO.
AI Integration: Revealing True Costs
The financial services sector is rapidly adopting Artificial Intelligence (AI), presenting private equity firms with new challenges in gauging AI integration costs within target companies. Expenses extend beyond initial technology investments, with hidden costs arising from data preparation, specialised talent, ongoing maintenance, and essential infrastructure upgrades [3].
Industry data indicates that 29% of banking, financial services, and insurance (BFSI) organisations are integrating AI, with a further 47% developing AI initiatives [4]. Barriers to AI adoption include a lack of in-house expertise (30%), high implementation costs (30%), and ROI uncertainty (25%) [4].
These figures highlight that while AI adoption accelerates, implementation challenges translate to unexpected expenses. For private equity firms, rigorous AI technology due diligence is crucial for accurate TCO assessments in transactions involving AI-driven entities. How thoroughly does your current due diligence process evaluate AI integration costs?
Navigating Regulatory Compliance Costs
Regulatory requirements within financial services are a major driver of hidden technology costs, often underestimated during due diligence. Evolving frameworks, especially in data protection, AI governance, and cross-border transactions, necessitate substantial technology investments for portfolio companies to maintain compliance [5].
The regulatory landscape is increasingly complex. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Bank of England have differing policies on AI use, including restrictions on uploading regulatory data to unapproved platforms [5]. Post-Brexit, UK businesses managing international transactions face stringent compliance demands, adhering to both EU and UK frameworks [5].
This divergence creates a complex environment requiring sophisticated technology and governance. These regulatory-driven technology investments represent a significant hidden cost, difficult to quantify initially but substantially affecting TCO and investment returns.
New regulations like the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) [6] and the Network and Information Security (NIS2) Directive [7] further mandate enhanced operational resilience and cybersecurity, incurring additional technology costs. Regulatory sandboxes, like those used by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), are becoming essential for testing and validating new technologies for compliance, allowing firms to innovate within controlled environments.
AI is now revolutionising corporate governance by enhancing decision-making and compliance processes [8]. AI-driven analytics process vast amounts of data in real-time, offering actionable insights and automating regulatory processes [8]. Is your portfolio prepared for the rising tide of regulatory tech demands?
Technical Debt: An Unseen Drain on Value
Technical debt is a hidden technology cost in private equity investments, often difficult to quantify during due diligence, yet significantly impacting portfolio valuations. This burden of suboptimal technology, outdated systems, and deferred maintenance increases TCO, eroding returns and complicating value creation [9].
Successful AI implementation could significantly boost banks’ annual operating profits, but this depends on addressing data management challenges [9]. This highlights both technology modernisation’s upside and technical debt’s hidden costs. For private equity investors, this is a critical TCO consideration.
Realising AI benefits requires tackling technical debt, often necessitating unplanned investments in data infrastructure, system integration, and modernisation—costs not initially factored into valuations. Private equity firms increasingly aim to transform technical debt into “technical wealth”, focusing on high-quality code and efficient deployment to create business value and reduce long-term costs [10].
AI-driven tools, employing NLP-powered codebase analysis, are emerging to help automate technical debt assessment in enterprise-scale systems common in banking infrastructure [11]. How thoroughly does your current due diligence process evaluate technical debt in potential acquisitions?
Escalating Cybersecurity Costs
Cybersecurity is an increasingly significant and underestimated component of technology TCO in private equity investments. As cyber threats become more sophisticated and regulations more stringent, portfolio companies often require substantial, unplanned investments in security infrastructure, talent, and processes. These costs are frequently inadequately accounted for during initial due diligence [12].
Recent figures are alarming: APP fraud losses in the first half of 2025 reached £485 million, driving increased adoption of behavioural biometric authentication [12]. Cyber insurance premiums are surging, up 40% year-on-year, reflecting escalating ransomware attacks [12].
These statistics underscore the rapidly escalating cybersecurity costs in financial services. For private equity investors, this trend represents a major hidden TCO component impacting investment returns. Global security spending is projected to grow, reaching $377 billion by 2028, driven by cyber threats [13].
Financial services professionals anticipate increased financial crime risk in 2025, with cybersecurity a top concern [14]. AI-powered cybersecurity solutions are advancing, offering financial services SMEs innovative tools to protect against sophisticated threats. AI systems are now crucial in financial data protection, detecting unusual login patterns and using biometrics to secure critical systems [15]. What percentage of your post-acquisition budget is allocated to addressing unforeseen cybersecurity costs?
Key Insight: Private equity firms can lose 15-20% of anticipated returns due to hidden tech costs. Robust AI Technology Due Diligence is essential to mitigate this risk.
Integration Complexity: Amplifying Post-Acquisition Costs
System integration challenges post-acquisition frequently lead to significant hidden technology costs for private equity firms. Merging disparate technology ecosystems, data structures, and processes often surpasses initial estimates, resulting in extended timelines, increased resource demands, and unplanned expenses impacting TCO and delaying value creation [16].
Recent transactions highlight these complexities. Tietoevry’s sale of its Tech Services business to Agilitas Private Equity signals a strategic shift but implies complex carve-out and integration activities with associated technology costs [16]. Similarly, Mastek, a key supplier to the UK government, faces uncertainty due to the NHS England merger into the Department of Health and Social Care, affecting 22% of its revenue [16].
These examples illustrate how integration complexity—from acquisitions, divestitures, or client reorganisations—frequently generates substantial unplanned technology expenses not fully captured in initial due diligence. Common pitfalls in post-acquisition integration include inadequate pre-acquisition technology assessment, employee resistance to change, and integrating incompatible systems [17].
Comprehensive technology assessments during due diligence and strategic change management plans are essential to mitigate these [17]. Best practices for AI integration into legacy systems in financial services acquisitions include a phased approach to transformation and prioritising API-first integration using middleware solutions [18, 5].
Private equity firms are now leveraging AI to optimise post-merger technology integration, streamlining operations and enhancing decision-making [19].
The Hidden Price of Talent Acquisition and Retention
Technology talent costs are a frequently underestimated TCO component in private equity investments, particularly for portfolio companies undergoing digital transformation. Recruiting, retaining, and developing specialised technology talent—especially in AI, cybersecurity, and data science—often exceeds initial projections, leading to budget variances and project delays [20].
Hiring statistics reveal intense competition for technology talent in financial services. Fintech accounts for 21% of tech hiring in the UK, with AI roles following at 12.5%, indicating strong investor interest and sector resilience [20]. This competitive landscape translates to higher compensation, increased recruitment costs, and potential delays.
These talent-related expenses frequently represent a significant hidden cost component not fully captured during initial technology due diligence. Recruitment leaders find it increasingly difficult to source AI talent, with enterprises offering premium salaries [21].
Strategies to attract and retain top tech talent include leveraging visa sponsorships, upskilling for the AI talent shortage, fostering employee well-being, and promoting diversity in STEM [21, 22, 23]. Generative AI is also being leveraged to create personalised employee engagement strategies, enhancing retention [24]. Are talent acquisition costs accurately factored into your TCO assessments?
Case Study: A UK private equity firm recently discovered £3.2 million in unplanned technology integration costs six months after acquiring a financial services provider. A comprehensive pre-acquisition technology assessment would have identified these issues, allowing for negotiation leverage and appropriate budget allocation.
AI Technology Due Diligence: Illuminating Hidden Costs
To effectively mitigate these hidden technology costs, private equity firms require robust AI Technology Due Diligence. This process should incorporate the following key elements:
- Comprehensive Technology Assessment: Thoroughly evaluate the target company’s technology infrastructure to identify risks and opportunities, assessing scalability, security, and integration. Implement structured technology stack audits using frameworks like TOGAF to map dependencies and conduct performance stress testing to identify scalability limitations. This provides a detailed understanding of the technology landscape and potential integration challenges.
- Technical Debt Analysis: To address the critical issue of technical debt accumulation from legacy systems impacting portfolio valuations, quantify costs associated with outdated systems and suboptimal technology. This analysis should include code quality assessment, architecture evaluation, and a prioritised remediation roadmap with associated costs and timelines. Deploy static code analysis tools to measure code quality and calculate the technical debt ratio (TDR). Platforms achieve faster legacy migration cycles through ML-based architectural pattern recognition [25]. This ensures a clear picture of the remediation efforts needed and their financial implications.
- Cybersecurity Audit: Detail the target’s security posture to identify vulnerabilities and threats. Bundled audits covering cyber-insurance eligibility scoring alongside IT assessments are increasingly critical. AI-driven predictive threat detection systems can reduce false positives compared to traditional systems [26]. Employ AI-powered authentication systems to enhance data protection and prevent unauthorised access, crucial in M&A integrations [15]. This proactive approach minimises risks and ensures robust security measures are in place.
- AI Readiness Evaluation: Determine the true cost of AI integration, including data preparation, talent acquisition, and infrastructure upgrades. Automated infrastructure assessment frameworks can evaluate cloud readiness scores against industry benchmarks. This step clarifies the investment needed to leverage AI effectively and avoid budget overruns.
- Regulatory Compliance Review: Ensure the target company meets relevant regulatory requirements, including data privacy and industry-specific regulations. Generative AI platforms can reduce manual effort in mapping regulatory obligations. Regulatory sandboxes enable live testing of fintech innovations under relaxed rules, allowing validation of compliance frameworks before full deployment. AI-driven platforms now offer real-time regulatory compliance monitoring, enhancing security and efficiency [27]. This guarantees adherence to evolving regulations and avoids potential penalties.
- Integration Planning: Develop a detailed plan for integrating the target’s technology, anticipating challenges and costs. Dynamic risk-modelling engines can simulate post-merger integration scenarios to quantify potential downtime costs. Leverage AI to optimise post-merger integration processes, reducing timelines and ensuring smoother transitions [19]. Banks are now entering the early majority phase of adopting Generative AI, particularly in post-merger scenarios to enhance call-centre productivity and code development efficiency, highlighting the practical applications of AI in streamlining integrations [29]. This strategic foresight streamlines the integration process and minimises disruptions.
- Talent Assessment: Evaluate the target’s technology team to identify skills gaps and retention risks. Talent arbitrage networks can help model workforce synergies pre-acquisition. Agentic/AI career development tools can provide hyper-personalised guidance, improving transparency and retention. Utilise AI-enhanced recruitment and skills development strategies to secure and retain top tech talent [28]. AI-powered predictive analytics are also being integrated into financial planning tools, crucial for understanding employee sentiment and predicting potential attrition risks, further demonstrating AI’s role in talent management [30]. This proactive talent strategy ensures that the necessary expertise is available to drive post-acquisition success.
- Hidden tech costs can significantly erode private equity returns in financial services acquisitions.
- AI Technology Due Diligence is crucial for uncovering and mitigating these hidden costs.
- A comprehensive assessment covers technical debt, cybersecurity, regulatory compliance, AI readiness, integration planning, and talent.
- Diligize offers expert services to navigate these complexities and ensure informed investment decisions.
By implementing comprehensive AI Technology Due Diligence, private equity firms gain a clearer understanding of the true cost of technology, enabling informed investment decisions and maximised returns. Diligize provides expert technology advisory services, empowering private equity firms and their portfolio companies to navigate these complexities.
Our tailored approach ensures informed decisions, effective risk mitigation, and enhanced operational efficiency. Diligize’s comprehensive assessments uncover hidden risks and align technology strategies with investment objectives, combining cost efficiency with deep expertise to deliver maximum value in every engagement.
Hidden tech costs pose a significant threat to private equity firms’ TCO and investment returns. Proactively understanding these hidden costs and implementing robust AI Technology Due Diligence will enable more informed investment decisions and greater success.
As regulatory landscapes evolve and technology advances, thorough due diligence will only intensify in importance. Improved transparency in investment products, driven by regulatory changes, further underscores the need for private equity firms to meticulously assess and manage all technology costs to maintain investor confidence and optimise valuations.
To ensure your private equity firm isn’t blindsided by hidden technology costs, consider implementing a comprehensive AI Technology Due Diligence framework before your next acquisition. Contact Diligize today to discover how our expert-led approach can enhance your investment strategy and potentially recover that 15-20% of returns typically lost to hidden technology costs.
Our Opinion
At Diligize, we have consistently championed the necessity of rigorous technology due diligence within private equity. The potential for hidden technology expenses to diminish anticipated returns by 15-20% is not merely a theoretical concern; it is a tangible risk we routinely encounter. Our core mission is predicated on delivering expert technology advisory services that proactively address precisely these challenges. We recognise that for private equity firms, the imperative is to maximise returns and minimise unforeseen complications. Therefore, our methodology is meticulously designed to be both comprehensive and forward-thinking, ensuring a thorough evaluation of a target company’s technology infrastructure.
For us, the critical areas identified – technical debt, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, regulatory adherence, the intricacies of AI integration, and the often underestimated costs associated with talent acquisition – are integral facets of our due diligence framework. We harness our profound expertise and cutting-edge AI-powered tools to illuminate these concealed costs, furnishing our clients with a transparent and precise understanding of the total technology expenditure. Our pledge is to serve as a dependable partner throughout the investment lifecycle, guaranteeing that our clients are empowered to make well-informed decisions, safeguard their investments, and ultimately realise exceptional returns. This is not merely a service we offer; it is the very essence of Diligize.
Steve Denby, based in London, UK, is a Senior Partner and an entrepreneur, technologist, consultant, public speaker, and leader with 28 years of experience in managed IT services. Specialising in private equity-backed businesses and rapid-growth organisations, Steve has deep expertise in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), supported by his studies at Imperial College Business School. He focuses on minimising risk and creating value through technology in privately invested companies growing by acquisition.
- https://ifamagazine.com/aim-sees-7-8bn-of-ma-deals-in-past-year-5bn-of-those-takeovers-executed-by-private-equity/
- https://www.techuk.org/resource/major-barriers-to-ai-adoption-remain-for-uk-businesses-despite-growing-demand-new-report-reveals.html
- https://finance.yahoo.com/news/future-ai-banking-balancing-innovation-094446579.html
- https://www.itweb.co.za/article/unlock-the-future-of-financial-services-insights-from-the-expleo-bfsi-ai-report/8OKdWqDXwLlqbznQ
- https://www.investmentweek.co.uk/news-analysis/4411271/uk-regulators-diverge-rules-ai-employees
- https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/dora-digital-operational-resilience-act
- https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3AL%3A2022%3A2555%3AFIN
- https://dev.to/priyankapandey/ai-in-corporate-governance-transforming-decision-making-and-compliance-in-2025-2f7g
- https://finance.yahoo.com/news/future-ai-banking-balancing-innovation-094446579.html
- https://tdwi.org/articles/2023/12/11/adv-all-technical-debt-vs-technical-wealth.aspx
- Internal Research
- https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/financial-crime-firms-urged-act-authorised-push-payment-fraud-losses-rise
- https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-gartner-forecasts-global-security-and-risk-management-spending-to-grow-12-point-2-percent-in-2024
- https://www.finextra.com/newsarticle/43758/financial-crime-expected-to-increase-in-2025
- https://techbullion.com/the-role-of-ai-in-strengthening-financial-data-protection/
- https://www.theregister.com/2024/03/21/tietoevryagilitastech_services/
- https://www.apollotechnical.com/blog/post-merger-integration-challenges/
- [Best Practices for Integrating AI into Legacy Systems in Financial Services Acquisitions 1, 3]
- https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250324854654/en/London-School-of-Economics-and-Political-Science-Partners-with-Globality-to-Pioneer-Use-of-AI-Driven-Sourcing-in-Higher-Education-Sector
- https://www.cityam.com/uk-job-market-cools-but-financial-services-and-fintech-sectors-remain-resilient/
- https://www.computerweekly.com/news/300404789/UK-enterprises-turn-to-visa-sponsorships-to-secure-AI-talent
- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-address-ai-talent-shortage-upskilling-your-workforce-alina-vandivere/
- https://www.builtinla.com/diversity-inclusion/diversity-stem-statistics
- https://www.theglobaltreasurer.com/2025/03/24/reimagining-future-of-investment-management-with-generative-ai/
- Internal Research
- Internal Research
- https://ffnews.com/newsarticle/fintech/latest-wave-of-trulioo-ai-and-learning-innovation-accelerates-job-processing-by-60/
- https://digit.fyi/recruitment-leaders-struggling-to-find-ai-talent-report-claims/
- https://internationalbanker.com/banking/genai-in-banking-a-reality-check/
- https://www.itnews.com.au/state-of-finance-tech/state-of-finance-tech-financial-planning-analysis-615811
